|
english
>>
Who has offended deputy Mitrofanov?
A bill, proposed by deputy Mitrofanov on May 13, in fact wounds not only, or
even not so much, lesbians, but mainly childless women in our country. Because
this way of life, accompanied with "baby birth reduction and population cutting-down" serves for the bill' author as a reason for regarding women like
society enemies and, consequently, for placing them into prison within 5 years.
In 1934 our regime in the person of Stalin decided that homosexuality is very
bad thing. And gays in our country were condemned in accordance with 121
article, though in 90th there were only a few cases. Apparently 121 article was
used as a way of political pressure. Simultaneously with acceptance of this
article homosexuality was ceased mentioning in mass media, it became to be
"unnamed". Nowadays leader of deputy group "People's Deputy" Gennadij Raikov
proposed in State Duma a bill, concerning the renewal of this article. In his
interview he declared: "Our opinion is that this penalty has to be returned
obligatory, and there are three reasons for that: AIDS distribution, breach of
social morality and existence of four religious confessions in Russia, which
dogmata prohibit homosexuality. So they can relax from one to five years." A
couple of weeks later, May, 13 deputy Mitrofanov proposed his bill, concerning
lesbians prosecution. Being interviewed by broadcasting station "Moscow Echo",
Mitrofanov stated that his initiative appears to be "a kind of reply" to the
"People's deputy" initiative". He said: "According to our constitution, all
people have equal rights. So if we prosecute man, we have to prosecute women
obligatory! Being a lesbian is more terrible then being a gay. People's reproduction and children upbringing depends on women. If lesbian way of life
was declared and developed plainly, we would loose mothers, while mothers are
more important then males, from the state viewpoint.

For Lesbiru.com imprisonment seems to be rather strange way of birth rate increasing, but the fact that deputy Mitrofanov's own childlessness evokes some
questions. His beautiful wife - Marina Lillevyali, parliament RTR correspondent, is working in the State Duma for 8 years. She is considered by
her colleagues to be rather strong-willed woman, visiting belligerent Yugoslavia, elucidating submarine "Kursk" tragedy, owning an order "For personal
courage", relating her work in White House in 1993. Marina has a child, born in
previous marriage. Talking about her present husband, she complains of his
common helplessness and laziness; relating his political career she says:
"Mitrofanov usually yells in Duma. Formerly it was irritating me very much, but
nowadays, when they say: "Your husband was yelling today!", - I chase away: so
what?"
When Zhirinovsky has extirpated deputy Evgenia Tishkova, his assistant Aleksei Mitrofanov explained it to his future wife - "Vesti" correspondent
Marina Lillevyali: "He just wants her, that's it! But you will cut it out
anywhere!" Meanwhile, Mr. Mitrofanov is almost 40 years old, and we can't say
his appearance beams with health and beauty. You can notice short breath along
with sizeable weight, blood pressure, heart ischemia, while hypodinamia,
together with gastronomic glad and deputy stresses, have certainly let him know
with chronic gastritis (or even stomach ulcer), cholecistitis, problems with
pancreas and liver. Myopia is present also. By the way, superfluous weight might
also be an indication of hormone disbalance. Adding pernicious habits and
dislike for sport commitments, you can hardly be envious of such man' spermogram. And twice as much you can envy his young wife, who begins her day
with fitness training.
Wretched law, concerning polygamy and being promoted by Liberal-Democratic Party, Marina has commented like: "I was always saying: "Mitrofanov, I'm for
it!" I even have two candidates - my best friends. But I propose the only
correction: every new wife can be accepted only under the agreement of other
wives, with the help of voting". So it's an incomprehensible to find out which
one in this advanced family is more interested in female harem. There is one
more question, concerning former Mr. Mitrofanov's initiative: isn't it settling
personal scores?... Talking about lesbians, annoying Mr. Mitrofanov so much that
he has forgotten about his professional passion - geopolitics (it seems that
problems like international terrorism, wars, economical slumps, political
scandals do not exist anymore) and turned his attention to our side - we'll
begin with ourselves, being so disgusting.
Mr. Mitrofanov graduated Moscow State University of International Relationships, he is a main assistant of Liberal-Democratic Party' leader, and
before drawing such radical conclusions, resting upon his communications with
unknown for a wide society lesbians, who offended him so much, he could clarify
for himself a fertility situation in Russia. You do not even have to graduate a
technical culinary school to familiarize yourself with statistics, reflecting
the direct relation between fertility rate and economic prosperity, as well as
accessibility of qualified medical care.
- Every 50 out of 1000 pregnant childbearing age women are having an abortion.
- Maternal mortality in Russia is twice as much as in Europe - approximately 40
out of 100 000 confined women.
- 123 304 kids in Russia become an orphans annually.
- Only 20 000 kids find new family, and approximately half of these cases -
adoption by stepmothers and stepfathers.
- 180 215 kids are living in boarding schools and children's homes.
- During the Perestroika 1,2 millions of reproductive age women leaved Russia,
Ukraine and Belarus'. They will be bearing their children in other countries.
Russia has lost them and their children.
- Approximately 7-9 millions married couples in Russia are childless. They are
ready to use telegenesis, but are our state ready to pay $1000 for every woman?
(For example, in Israel 2 first attempts of telegenesis are financially covered
by the system of state insurance.)
- Nowadays medical personnel (nurse and midwife) receive a salary scale, rating
600-700 rubles a month (approximately $20).
- An "army of strays", according to various estimations, makes up from one to
four millions of children.
So, may be in spite of persuading "selfish feminists" and "irresponsible lesbians" for bearing new "future fatherland defenders", our state would be
anxious about those, who are already born and roam down the streets - muddy,
hungry and restless?
Professor Bladimir Sedov, member of Russian Academy of Sciences, Scientific
Center of Midwifery, Gynecology and Perinatology director' assistant: "As for
the birth rate, the result would be quite different, if woman was well fed, if
she lived in satisfactory ecological environment, if she didn't overstrain
herself at the job during her pregnancy period, if she was surrounded with love
and care in her family. Pregnant woman is forsaken not by our medicine, but by
our society. Not to mention the question: who will be bearing children without
stable decent earnings and tomorrow's day confidence?"
V. Elizarov, Center of studying population problems (Economic Department,
Moscow State University) director: "Many women do not want to bear their
children for the state, but they still can't bear kids for themselves. We've
created the conditions for middle class economic sterilization. Moderate means
family can afford bearing only one child. Income, pensions and children cash
benefits growth is twice as less as basket of goods cost growth. Almost everywhere there is payments' delay."
Andrei Akopyan, professor, Doctor of Medical Science, director of Republic
man reproduction Center: "It is rather vexing and ridiculous situation: our
politicians are trying to draw their "new" ideas out from the Peter, the Great
period. At that time population of Russian Empire was equal to 10 millions,
birth rate was more then sufficient, so the price of human life was miserable.
But laws of evolution and society development are inexorable, dictating the time
for stones gathering and dispersion. These laws strongly determine political
processes and historical occasions. Birth rate depends on nation age, its
civilization level, being best contraceptive remedy. In well-developed countries
period of rapid natality is over. We do not have to worry or become happy about
it. We ought to settle account with it, like with sunrise. Our present population level is a consequence of starvation and Stalin's repressions,
dispossession of kulaks and "great age constructions", World War II and unrestrained alcoholism. And the greatest injury - unborn children, whom
Russian people could bring up, instead of building communism and exporting
revolution. According to demographer counts, our population nowadays could come
to 300 millions - more than in America. The problem is that, according to the
development laws, in the frames of ethnos with complete demographic transition
there exists equilibrium: low birth rate is filled up with the growth of life
longevity. This phenomenon hasn't taken place in Russia. Our country, very
lavish for phenomena, produced one more: depopulation. Mortality exceeds birth
rate over 1,6 times. Our country became a graveyard of young males."
By the way, childlessness is just a medical diagnosis, like invalidity, for example. And if it is becomes, according to Mr. Mitrofanov, to throw in jail
childless women, so childless man, according to this logic, ought to be put in
prison also, together with all incapable citizens. As to invalids and pensioners, the most advantageous way for the state - shooting them. But this is
the way of following the logic. Following the wish of sharing Mr. Raikov
doubtful fame, based on simple and comprehensible desire like "I wanna my
portrait looking out from all the papers, bashfully and definitely!" means
rather protracted joke. Moreover, pronounced by deputy, this joke is being more
then untimely and offensive. The law, concerning criminal prosecution of gays
and lesbians, is not required by the state, as well as by our society. Just
because humans sexual orientation can't be inculcated artificially or "improved"
by administrative-punitive methods. But there is another question, namely: what
would be the modification of public opinion, concerning "incomprehensible
quasilegal" existence of sexual minorities in our country: "it seems they are
not imprisoned, but it turns out soon the will be..."
All democratic sledding may come to nothing - people reinsure "just in case", especially in provincial
regions, they go underground again. They are frigh-te-ned! Because everything in
our country is possible: coupons for vodka, 1937 year, as well as any other
years. Initiatives, owned by gentlemen like Mitrofanov and Raikov, cause direct
damage to national, just springing up, business. Various clubs, tourist firms,
publishers, pooling of interests... Businessmen and partners want some assurance, at least - that they won't be called accessories and they won't be
imprisoned one fine day. So what can be said about the constancy and perspective? Let us imagine that tomorrow our deputies will be discussing such
smokers' penalty as imprisonment, by declaring tobacco to be a drug (there is an
evidence of causal relationships, direct threat to single citizen, his neighbor
and humanity as a whole!). So the only way to sober somebody up will be an idea
that a half, unless greater, part of the population will be put in the dock. But
why the are sexual minorities, who are considered to be so scanty that they can
be subjected to repression with impunity? Lesbians, alone, constitute more than
a million, while gays - 4% from whole population, at the minimum. Adding here an
army of bisexuals you'll get a body of electors' extent piece - a tasty morsel,
comparable with grandma-activists, inspired by plain election PR-campaign of
routine benefactor. Lesbians are not those women who've got accustomed to crying
in the corner, hiding over not broad (already) male backs. We don't like the
fact that somebody is trying to put us without the law - regardless of what it
would be - a joke, someone's populist move or mental marasmus. It will be easy,
and even rather pleasantly for us to take part, as volunteers, in election
campaign of some homo- and lesbi- fobs, narrating voters about how state
(meaning - our, voters) money are spent, paid for the deputy as an official
salary.
Our readers may say: "Wait a minute! So what is the connection between lesbians, deputies and birth rate?" No connection. Do you remember two troubles,
since earliest times - roads and fools, explaining, which road we have to go?
These problems stay to be actual up to now. The point is that relation core
between state and family hasn't been changed through the years of democracy: our
country doesn't need children; she needs grown-up children - soldiers, taxpayers
and voters.
Lesbiru.Com (c) May, 2002
Comments:
Maria Arbatova, writer, feminist: "In any civilized country a man would have
been brought into criminal account because of such project. In our country they
were laughing. Moreover, out deputies have given just few comments about this
situation in mass media, being frightened "not to be considered to be..."
Svetlana Konegen, TV-presenter: "...As to my pal Mitrofanov, I've told him:
what do you do with lesbians, stinker? You're jesting, and I have to answer
for it. He says: "Refer them to me." Me: "For what? So that you could reclaim
or jail them for ten years?" He answers: "We'll reclaim those who can be
reclaimed, others will be jailed." How do you like this rascal!"
Elena Pogrebizhskaya, "Butch" leader: "It is just gibberish. They can't
intrude upon our bed. It's not deputy's business."
Frida, singer: "I've always been protecting the rights of sexual minorities,
and I'll keep on doing it."
Quotation from discussing forum at Irina
Khakamada's site: "Gays, lesbians and Raikov. After rummaging in different sites, I've unexpectedly found some
information, concerning trials about breach of gays and lesbians rights in
Europe and USA. You can look, if you are interested. 1975, McAlister vs. Exxon.
By the way, Iowa's senator was presented to be a public attorney. Quotation:
"...we've been born in free country, and we all, regardless of our believes,
color of skin, preferences in life and sex, are the citizens of our great
country. We wouldn't allow prejudicing our freedom and belief into fairness in
sake of ghostly and momentary goals." These materials you can find on the
Congress Library site."
VolgaVolga, chief-editor of Lesbiru.com: "The problem here is apparently not
in lesbians, nor in gays. The point is in politicians, considering sexual
minorities to be a mass "fright"; earlier this role was played by Jews - for
nazi, as well as "nation enemies", otherwise-minded, "person of Caucasian
nationality", illegals and all "second-sorted people". Pointsmen, being guilty
of everything: growth of prices, crimes, bad harvest, diseases, low birth rate,
throng in the bus, befouled entrance and your indigestion. The difference is
that sexual minorities appear to be so vulnerable toy windmills, and disputing
them with lawcreation cudgel is not only honorable and prestigious, but also
rather comfortable and safe: in Russia a subject of sexual orientation still
remains to be taboo. Major being came-out gay or political figure being lesbian
are as fantastic phenomena, as brown bears in caps with ear-flats at Moscow
streets. We haven't passed our Stonewall. Gays and lesbians won't be occupied
with politics until politic won't be occupied with gays and lesbians. They won't
have any choice in this situation."
©
Lesbiru, 2001-2002
© translation on english wil,
2002
All right reserved, no part of this publication may be reprodused.
return
|